Threats to safety in the U.S. come in many forms, from the continued presence of the COVID-19 pandemic and natural disasters to mass shootings and traffic accidents.
People can feel unsafe in other ways, too. Aside from the types of hazards that can cause bodily injury or other physical harm, taking out an unaffordable second mortgage, forgoing health insurance or even visiting unsecured websites are also ways people run into danger. One of the biggest worries for many people right now is the cost of inflation, which reached a four-decade high this year and threatens Americans’ financial safety.
No one can avoid all danger, however, and we take on a certain level of risk based on where we choose to live. Some cities are simply better at protecting their residents from harm. To determine where Americans can feel most secure — in more than one sense — WalletHub compared more than 180 cities across 42 key indicators of safety. Our data set ranges from the percentage of residents who are fully vaccinated and assaults per capita to the unemployment rate and road quality.
Table of Contents
Main FindingsAsk the ExpertsMethodology
Main Findings
Embed on your website
Safest Cities in the U.S.
Overall Rank* | City | Total Score | Home & Community Safety | Natural-Disaster Risk | Financial Safety |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Columbia, MD | 85.99 | 1 | 63 | 92 |
2 | Nashua, NH | 84.44 | 11 | 27 | 2 |
3 | Laredo, TX | 83.96 | 4 | 24 | 107 |
4 | Portland, ME | 83.49 | 16 | 11 | 8 |
5 | Warwick, RI | 83.19 | 5 | 22 | 98 |
6 | Yonkers, NY | 83.19 | 3 | 39 | 113 |
7 | Gilbert, AZ | 82.04 | 12 | 14 | 60 |
8 | Burlington, VT | 81.90 | 27 | 37 | 11 |
9 | Raleigh, NC | 81.46 | 19 | 55 | 24 |
10 | Lewiston, ME | 81.40 | 33 | 12 | 21 |
11 | Juneau, AK | 81.39 | 60 | 50 | 1 |
12 | Winston-Salem, NC | 81.03 | 26 | 40 | 59 |
13 | Madison, WI | 80.92 | 15 | 89 | 49 |
14 | Bismarck, ND | 80.51 | 37 | 64 | 18 |
15 | South Burlington, VT | 80.25 | 59 | 36 | 3 |
16 | Chandler, AZ | 80.11 | 41 | 8 | 38 |
17 | Fremont, CA | 79.98 | 10 | 157 | 5 |
18 | Virginia Beach, VA | 79.85 | 20 | 44 | 100 |
19 | Scottsdale, AZ | 79.75 | 35 | 53 | 41 |
20 | Brownsville, TX | 79.70 | 22 | 2 | 153 |
21 | Boise, ID | 79.56 | 38 | 71 | 23 |
22 | Cedar Rapids, IA | 79.53 | 28 | 101 | 32 |
23 | Manchester, NH | 79.51 | 53 | 30 | 16 |
24 | Pearl City, HI | 79.48 | 2 | N/A | 10 |
25 | Pembroke Pines, FL | 79.45 | 14 | 48 | 152 |
26 | Irvine, CA | 79.25 | 6 | 150 | 61 |
27 | Cape Coral, FL | 79.19 | 13 | 111 | 115 |
28 | Worcester, MA | 79.01 | 43 | 17 | 69 |
29 | Peoria, AZ | 78.87 | 48 | 26 | 65 |
30 | Casper, WY | 78.70 | 56 | 20 | 83 |
31 | Bridgeport, CT | 78.33 | 47 | 16 | 108 |
32 | Fargo, ND | 77.99 | 73 | 77 | 13 |
33 | Chesapeake, VA | 77.97 | 30 | 69 | 130 |
34 | Las Cruces, NM | 77.89 | 51 | 66 | 79 |
35 | Salem, OR | 77.89 | 65 | 70 | 37 |
36 | Fort Wayne, IN | 77.83 | 54 | 59 | 81 |
37 | Aurora, IL | 77.77 | 17 | 91 | 155 |
38 | Chula Vista, CA | 77.69 | 18 | 132 | 74 |
39 | Santa Rosa, CA | 77.66 | 21 | 153 | 14 |
40 | Glendale, CA | 77.50 | 8 | 151 | 124 |
41 | Henderson, NV | 77.41 | 25 | 95 | 140 |
42 | Tempe, AZ | 77.40 | 77 | 9 | 54 |
43 | Charlotte, NC | 77.34 | 69 | 57 | 36 |
44 | Providence, RI | 77.33 | 50 | 10 | 126 |
45 | Cheyenne, WY | 77.25 | 49 | 97 | 82 |
46 | Mesa, AZ | 77.24 | 61 | 18 | 80 |
47 | Nampa, ID | 77.19 | 66 | 49 | 71 |
48 | San Diego, CA | 77.11 | 36 | 130 | 33 |
49 | Irving, TX | 77.06 | 29 | 125 | 70 |
50 | Lincoln, NE | 77.00 | 62 | 105 | 19 |
51 | Missoula, MT | 76.86 | 58 | 108 | 51 |
52 | Rochester, NY | 76.82 | 75 | 4 | 101 |
53 | Durham, NC | 76.82 | 82 | 42 | 34 |
54 | Santa Clarita, CA | 76.77 | 7 | 168 | 147 |
55 | Grand Prairie, TX | 76.65 | 39 | 112 | 105 |
56 | Sioux Falls, SD | 76.57 | 67 | 103 | 25 |
57 | Hialeah, FL | 76.36 | 9 | 128 | 176 |
58 | Vancouver, WA | 76.35 | 81 | 87 | 26 |
59 | Grand Rapids, MI | 76.31 | 86 | 7 | 53 |
60 | Spokane, WA | 76.09 | 90 | 19 | 39 |
61 | Tampa, FL | 75.69 | 68 | 92 | 84 |
62 | Omaha, NE | 75.61 | 71 | 107 | 45 |
63 | Oxnard, CA | 75.55 | 31 | 148 | 89 |
64 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 75.47 | 34 | 159 | 47 |
65 | Salt Lake City, UT | 75.42 | 80 | 116 | 22 |
66 | Oceanside, CA | 75.32 | 42 | 144 | 57 |
67 | New Haven, CT | 75.13 | 101 | 6 | 73 |
68 | Huntington Beach, CA | 74.82 | 32 | 170 | 63 |
69 | Greensboro, NC | 74.71 | 102 | 33 | 67 |
70 | North Las Vegas, NV | 74.65 | 40 | 99 | 169 |
71 | Tallahassee, FL | 74.63 | 88 | 28 | 131 |
72 | Norfolk, VA | 74.24 | 74 | 81 | 150 |
73 | San Jose, CA | 74.19 | 72 | 169 | 6 |
74 | Newport News, VA | 73.84 | 97 | 21 | 146 |
75 | Honolulu, HI | 73.83 | 23 | N/A | 27 |
76 | Garden Grove, CA | 73.78 | 44 | 171 | 88 |
77 | Glendale, AZ | 73.58 | 112 | 13 | 106 |
78 | Ontario, CA | 73.57 | 57 | 156 | 75 |
79 | Plano, TX | 73.50 | 105 | 113 | 42 |
80 | Fontana, CA | 73.49 | 52 | 163 | 87 |
81 | Minneapolis, MN | 73.40 | 99 | 131 | 17 |
82 | Billings, MT | 73.34 | 134 | 58 | 9 |
83 | Moreno Valley, CA | 73.28 | 45 | 166 | 119 |
84 | Overland Park, KS | 73.23 | 98 | 121 | 48 |
85 | Boston, MA | 73.11 | 129 | 35 | 20 |
86 | San Antonio, TX | 73.07 | 94 | 73 | 132 |
87 | Jersey City, NJ | 73.06 | 89 | 84 | 136 |
88 | Sacramento, CA | 72.96 | 91 | 119 | 56 |
89 | Columbia, SC | 72.91 | 87 | 83 | 157 |
90 | Newark, NJ | 72.90 | 78 | 29 | 179 |
91 | Des Moines, IA | 72.72 | 83 | 143 | 50 |
92 | Santa Ana, CA | 72.71 | 55 | 167 | 116 |
93 | Mobile, AL | 72.57 | 100 | 43 | 164 |
94 | Anaheim, CA | 72.55 | 63 | 154 | 99 |
95 | Arlington, TX | 72.42 | 84 | 122 | 122 |
96 | Rapid City, SD | 72.35 | 108 | 129 | 35 |
97 | El Paso, TX | 72.32 | 109 | 74 | 133 |
98 | Huntington, WV | 72.31 | 119 | 47 | 104 |
99 | Lubbock, TX | 72.29 | 110 | 114 | 64 |
100 | Montgomery, AL | 72.20 | 95 | 93 | 165 |
101 | Port St. Lucie, FL | 71.92 | 24 | N/A | 114 |
102 | Gulfport, MS | 71.87 | 111 | 56 | 162 |
103 | Tucson, AZ | 71.71 | 117 | 65 | 118 |
104 | Amarillo, TX | 71.64 | 85 | 162 | 68 |
105 | Jacksonville, FL | 71.61 | 120 | 62 | 128 |
106 | Columbus, GA | 71.51 | 113 | 38 | 167 |
107 | West Valley City, UT | 71.47 | 46 | N/A | 30 |
108 | Anchorage, AK | 71.40 | 92 | 161 | 44 |
109 | Miami, FL | 71.37 | 70 | 118 | 178 |
110 | Fort Smith, AR | 71.23 | 133 | 94 | 46 |
111 | Aurora, CO | 71.14 | 96 | 133 | 117 |
112 | Knoxville, TN | 70.90 | 118 | 78 | 135 |
113 | Phoenix, AZ | 70.82 | 137 | 25 | 94 |
113 | Fresno, CA | 70.82 | 121 | 117 | 76 |
115 | St. Paul, MN | 70.67 | 64 | N/A | 15 |
116 | Augusta, GA | 70.64 | 136 | 61 | 171 |
117 | Huntsville, AL | 70.58 | 107 | 142 | 97 |
118 | Modesto, CA | 70.52 | 124 | 135 | 31 |
119 | Toledo, OH | 70.48 | 128 | 60 | 141 |
120 | Pittsburgh, PA | 70.44 | 138 | 72 | 58 |
121 | Nashville, TN | 70.41 | 122 | 115 | 77 |
121 | Tulsa, OK | 70.41 | 116 | 120 | 102 |
123 | Dover, DE | 70.39 | 131 | 1 | 173 |
124 | Louisville, KY | 70.37 | 127 | 106 | 78 |
125 | Austin, TX | 70.23 | 143 | 98 | 29 |
126 | Riverside, CA | 70.21 | 93 | 164 | 95 |
127 | New York, NY | 70.13 | 132 | 34 | 138 |
128 | Charleston, WV | 69.99 | 150 | 45 | 28 |
129 | Fort Worth, TX | 69.88 | 104 | 134 | 144 |
130 | Buffalo, NY | 69.72 | 152 | 5 | 40 |
131 | Akron, OH | 69.64 | 126 | 68 | 163 |
132 | Garland, TX | 69.64 | 130 | 110 | 111 |
133 | Chicago, IL | 69.64 | 115 | 79 | 174 |
134 | Atlanta, GA | 69.63 | 123 | 82 | 154 |
135 | Reno, NV | 69.51 | 114 | 158 | 72 |
136 | San Francisco, CA | 69.50 | 146 | 123 | 4 |
137 | Portland, OR | 69.48 | 151 | 86 | 12 |
138 | Fayetteville, NC | 69.25 | 140 | 51 | 151 |
139 | Long Beach, CA | 69.10 | 103 | 152 | 134 |
140 | Wichita, KS | 68.66 | 106 | 172 | 110 |
141 | Cincinnati, OH | 68.44 | 145 | 76 | 137 |
142 | Albuquerque, NM | 68.41 | 149 | 88 | 66 |
143 | Corpus Christi, TX | 68.27 | 160 | 3 | 90 |
144 | Bakersfield, CA | 68.16 | 125 | 146 | 109 |
145 | Wilmington, DE | 68.10 | 144 | 23 | 175 |
146 | Lexington-Fayette, KY | 68.09 | 76 | N/A | 52 |
147 | Springfield, MO | 67.92 | 142 | 127 | 86 |
148 | Seattle, WA | 67.92 | 148 | 141 | 7 |
149 | Stockton, CA | 67.72 | 135 | 140 | 85 |
150 | St. Petersburg, FL | 67.54 | 79 | N/A | 55 |
151 | Indianapolis, IN | 67.35 | 138 | 124 | 120 |
152 | Shreveport, LA | 67.23 | 147 | 100 | 143 |
153 | Houston, TX | 67.18 | 141 | 102 | 158 |
154 | Orlando, FL | 66.74 | 163 | 32 | 96 |
155 | Milwaukee, WI | 66.66 | 154 | 52 | 148 |
156 | Las Vegas, NV | 65.35 | 153 | 96 | 161 |
157 | Colorado Springs, CO | 64.86 | 157 | 126 | 112 |
158 | Tacoma, WA | 64.18 | 159 | 145 | 91 |
159 | Columbus, OH | 64.16 | 169 | 46 | 139 |
160 | Charleston, SC | 63.94 | 155 | 165 | 93 |
161 | Baltimore, MD | 63.28 | 167 | 67 | 159 |
162 | Kansas City, MO | 63.00 | 162 | 138 | 129 |
163 | Little Rock, AR | 62.94 | 156 | 147 | 145 |
164 | Denver, CO | 62.80 | 166 | 139 | 62 |
165 | New Orleans, LA | 62.48 | 170 | 31 | 177 |
166 | Dallas, TX | 62.19 | 172 | 104 | 121 |
167 | Birmingham, AL | 61.90 | 161 | 136 | 170 |
168 | Washington, DC | 61.75 | 177 | 80 | 103 |
169 | Cleveland, OH | 61.26 | 171 | 54 | 180 |
170 | Philadelphia, PA | 61.12 | 176 | 15 | 160 |
171 | Richmond, VA | 60.82 | 178 | 75 | 127 |
172 | Los Angeles, CA | 60.75 | 164 | 149 | 149 |
173 | Chattanooga, TN | 60.54 | 175 | 109 | 125 |
174 | Jackson, MS | 60.48 | 168 | 137 | 172 |
175 | Oakland, CA | 60.45 | 174 | 155 | 43 |
176 | Oklahoma City, OK | 58.49 | 158 | 173 | 123 |
177 | Memphis, TN | 58.47 | 173 | 85 | 182 |
178 | Baton Rouge, LA | 56.51 | 182 | 90 | 166 |
179 | Detroit, MI | 55.58 | 181 | 41 | 181 |
180 | San Bernardino, CA | 54.41 | 180 | 160 | 142 |
181 | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 48.78 | 165 | N/A | 168 |
182 | St. Louis, MO | 42.81 | 179 | N/A | 156 |
Note: *No. 1 = Safest
With the exception of “Total Score,” all of the columns in the table above depict the relative rank of that city, where a rank of 1 represents the best conditions for that metric category.
Traffic Fatalities per Capita
Fewest
- 1. Columbia, MD
- 2. Glendale, CA
- 3. Pearl City, HI
- 4. Honolulu, HI
- 5. Oxnard, CA
Most
- T-173. Baton Rouge, LA
- T-173. St. Louis, MO
- T-173. Detroit, MI
- T-173. Jackson, MS
- T-173. Memphis, TN
Best City vs. Worst City: 36x Difference
Columbia, MD vs. Memphis, TN
Law-Enforcement Employees per Capita
Most
- T-1. Washington, DC
- T-1. New York, NY
- T-1. Jersey City, NJ
- T-1. St. Louis, MO
- T-1. Chicago, IL
Fewest
- 172. Fontana, CA
- 173. Modesto, CA
- 174. Fremont, CA
- 175. Irvine, CA
- 176. Chula Vista, CA
Best City vs. Worst City: 7x Difference
Washington, DC vs. Chula Vista, CA
Assaults per Capita
Fewest
- 1. Irvine, CA
- 2. Nashua, NH
- 3. Warwick, RI
- 4. Glendale, CA
- 5. Virginia Beach, VA
Most
- T-173. Birmingham, AL
- T-173. St. Louis, MO
- T-173. Little Rock, AR
- T-173. Detroit, MI
- T-173. Memphis, TN
Best City vs. Worst City: 86x Difference
Irvine, CA vs. Memphis, TN
Hate Crimes per Capita
Fewest
- 1. Tampa, FL
- 2. Tulsa, OK
- 3. St. Louis, MO
- 4. Milwaukee, WI
- 5. Laredo, TX
Most
- T-163. Salem, OR
- T-163. Washington, DC
- T-163. Seattle, WA
- T-163. South Burlington, VT
- T-163. Cleveland, OH
Unemployment Rate
Lowest
- T-1. Miami, FL
- T-1. Springfield, MO
- T-1. Manchester, NH
- T-1. Hialeah, FL
- T-1. Sioux Falls, SD
- T-1. South Burlington, VT
Highest
- 176. Brownsville, TX
- 177. Wilmington, DE
- 178. Cleveland, OH
- 179. Dover, DE
- 180. Detroit, MI
Best City vs. Worst City: 5x Difference
Miami, FL vs. Detroit, MI
% of Households with Emergency Savings
Highest
- 1. Wichita, KS
- 2. Portland, ME
- T-3. Minneapolis, MN
- T-3. St. Paul, MN
- T-5. Portland, OR
- T-5. Vancouver, WA
Lowest
- T-116. Miami, FL
- T-116. Hialeah, FL
- T-116. Fort Lauderdale, FL
- T-116. Pembroke Pines, FL
- 120. Memphis, TN
Best City vs. Worst City: 2x Difference
Wichita, KS vs. Memphis, TN
% of Uninsured Population
Lowest
- 1. South Burlington, VT
- 2. Pearl City, HI
- 3. Fremont, CA
- 4. Worcester, MA
- 5. Warwick, RI
Highest
- 178. Dallas, TX
- 179. Houston, TX
- 180. Garland, TX
- 181. Laredo, TX
- 182. Brownsville, TX
Best City vs. Worst City: 17x Difference
South Burlington, VT vs. Brownsville, TX
Natural-Disaster Risk Level
Lowest
- 1. Dover, DE
- 2. Brownsville, TX
- 3. Corpus Christi, TX
- 4. Rochester, NY
- 5. Buffalo, NY
Highest
- 169. San Jose, CA
- 170. Huntington Beach, CA
- 171. Garden Grove, CA
- 172. Wichita, KS
- 173. Oklahoma City, OK
Show More
Ask the Experts
For the best ways to improve safety, we asked a panel of experts to weigh in with their thoughts on the following key questions:
- What steps should local authorities take to help reduce the public costs associated with cleanups after major natural disasters? Should flood or other types of insurance be mandatory?
- What measures can police departments take to increase public trust? How important is it to have a police force that is representative of the local community?
- What can consumers do to increase their financial literacy, considering sound financial decisions increase a person's financial safety?
Ask the Experts
Steven G. Koven
Ph.D. – Professor, Department of Urban and Public Affairs – University of Louisville
Read More
Jason D. Rivera
Ph.D., MS, MPA – Associate Professor, Department of Public Management; Coordinator, MPA Emergency Management Specialization – John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Read More
Keith Boeckelman
Professor, Department of Political Science – Western Illinois University
Read More
Gary L. Rose
Ph.D. – Professor and Chair, Department of Government – Sacred Heart University
Read More
Doug Babcock
Adjunct Instructor – Saint Michael's College
Read More
Kenneth Kickham
Ph.D. – Professor and Chair, Department of Political Science, University of Central Oklahoma
Read More
Methodology
In order to determine the safest cities in which to live, WalletHub compared 182 cities — including the 150 most populated U.S. cities, plus at least two of the most populated cities in each state — across three key dimensions: 1) Home & Community Safety, 2) Natural-Disaster Risk, and 3) Financial Safety.
We evaluated those dimensions using 42 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the highest level of safety.
We then determined each city’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its overall score and used the resulting scores to rank-order our sample. In determining our sample, we considered only the city proper in each case, excluding cities in the surrounding metro area.
Home & Community Safety - Total Points: 50
- Percentage of Residents Who Are Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19: Double Weight (~4.76 Points)
- Presence of Terrorist Attacks: Triple Weight (~7.14 Points)
Note: This binary metric considers the presence or absence of terrorist attack or terrorist-related incident in the city between 2012 and 2022. - Number of Mass Shootings: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
- Murders & Non-Negligent Manslaughters per Capita: Triple Weight (~7.14 Points)
- Forcible Rapes per Capita: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
- Assaults per Capita: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
- Thefts per Capita: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
- Sex Offenders per Capita: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
- Law-Enforcement Employees per Capita: Half Weight (~1.19 Points)
- Active Firefighters per Capita: Half Weight (~1.19 Points)
- EMTs & Paramedics per Capita: Half weight (~1.19 Points)
Note: “EMTs” refer to Emergency Medical Technicians. - Hate Crimes per Capita: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
- Share of Sheltered Homeless: Half Weight (~1.19 Points)
- Perception of Safety (Safety walking alone during daylight/night): Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
Note: These data are based on perceptions of visitors of Numbeo website in the past 3 years. If the value is 0, it means it is perceived as very low, and if the value is 100, it means it is perceived as very high. - Drug Poisoning Deaths per Capita: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
- Traffic Fatalities per Capita: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
- Pedestrian Fatalities per Capita: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
Note: “Pedestrians” also includes pedacyclists. - Road Quality: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
Natural-Disaster Risk - Total Points: 30
- Earthquake Risk Level: Full Weight (~5.00 Points)
- Flood Risk Level: Full Weight (~5.00 Points)
- Hail Risk Level: Full Weight (~5.00 Points)
- Hurricane Storm-Surge Risk Level: Full Weight (~5.00 Points)
- Tornado Risk Level: Full Weight (~5.00 Points)
- Wildfire Risk Level: Full Weight (~5.00 Points)
Financial Safety - Total Points: 20
- Unemployment Rate: Double Weight (~2.11 Points)
- Underemployment Rate: Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
- Share of Uninsured Population: Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
- Share of Uninsured Drivers: Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
- Foreclosure Rate: Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
- Median Credit Score: Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
- Debt-to-Income Ratio: Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
- Share of Owner Occupied Housing Units Spending at Least 35% of Their Household Income on Housing: : Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
- Poverty Rate: Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
- Fraud & Other Complaints per Capita: Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
Note: “Other” includes both financial and nonfinancial complaints. - Identity-Theft Complaints per Capita: Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
- Share of Unbanked Households: Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
- Job Security: Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
Note: (Number of Employees in 2022 June - Number of Employees in 2021 June) / Number of Employees in 2021 June. - Employment Growth: Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
Note: This metric was adjusted for the working-age population growth and compares figures between 2022 and 2021. - Share of Households with Emergency Savings: Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
Note: This metric measures the share of households that saved for unexpected expenses or emergencies in the past 12 months. - Retirement Plan Access & Participation Rate: Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
Note: “Retirement Plan” includes only employer-based plans. - Personal Bankruptcy Filings per Capita: Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
- Share of Seriously Underwater Mortgages: Full Weight (~1.05 Points)
Note: This metric measures the proportion of seriously underwater mortgages, where the combined estimated balance of loans secured by those properties was at least 25 percent more than their estimated market value.
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected from the U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Bureau of Investigation, TransUnion, Parents for Megan’s Law, U.S. Fire Administration, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Wm. Robert Johnston, Federal Trade Commission, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Chmura Economics & Analytics, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Federal Highway Administration, The Road Information Program, The Pew Charitable Trusts, County Health Rankings, Numbeo, Gun Violence Archive, ATTOM Data Solutions – U.S. Natural Hazard Housing Risk Index, ATTOM Data Solutions - U.S. Foreclosure Market Report, ATTOM Data Solutions – U.S. Home Equity & Underwater Report, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Insurance Information Institute and The New York Times.
Supporting Video Files:
Was this article helpful?
Disclaimer: Editorial and user-generated content is not provided or commissioned by financial institutions. Opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and have not been approved or otherwise endorsed by any financial institution, including those that are WalletHub advertising partners. Our content is intended for informational purposes only, and we encourage everyone to respect our content guidelines. Please keep in mind that it is not a financial institution’s responsibility to ensure all posts and questions are answered.
Ad Disclosure: Certain offers that appear on this site originate from paying advertisers, and this will be noted on an offer’s details page using the designation "Sponsored", where applicable. Advertising may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). At WalletHub we try to present a wide array of offers, but our offers do not represent all financial services companies or products.